• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Saturday, March 25, 2023
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home Federal Government

Eighth Circuit Court lifts preliminary injunction of Iowa mask mandate ban

The U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the preliminary injunction on Iowa's law prohibiting schools from requiring masks in response to COVID-19.

Mary StrokabyMary Stroka
May 19, 2022
in Federal Government
Reading Time: 3 mins read
children sitting in the classroom

Photo by Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels.com

(The Center Square) – A three-member panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the preliminary injunction on Iowa’s law banning schools from requiring masks because of the shift in the COVID-19 pandemic.

RELATED POSTS

Ernst demands SBA prioritize fraud detection and prevention after widespread PPP fraud

During Sunshine Week, Ernst introduces bill to bring transperancy to taxpayer funding

Ernst calls on White House to reinstate ban on ‘risky research’

The district court in September issued the injunction blocking the state law. The same panel partially reinstated the ban in January, but Monday’s ruling vacated that earlier opinion.

The Circuit Court opinion held by Circuit Court Judges Duane Benton and Ralph Erickson said that children older than four could receive the vaccine, significantly decreasing the Plaintiffs’ children’s risk of severe bodily injury or death from contracting COVID-19 at school.

While Delta, the dominant COVID-19 strain when the plaintiffs asked for the preliminary injunction, had high transmission rates and caseloads nationally, Omicron is now the dominant strain, and it’s subsided, with lower transmission rates and caseloads, the opinion added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court has not yet taken a position on the plaintiffs’ claims. However, as the case continues, the parties and the district court should pay special attention to a section of the facial coverings law as the case continues: the exception for “any other provision in law.”

“If another state or federal law requires masks, Section 280.31 does not conflict with that law – and thus should not be completely enjoined,” the opinion said.

The ACLU of Iowa’s lawsuit against the state continues, however.

“The lawsuit was filed to protect Iowa students with disabilities who need to be protected by masking from COVID from the way the state was enforcing a new Iowa law. That new state law prohibited schools from requiring masking,” ACLU of Iowa said in its response to the decision. “The Court’s decision today vacates as moot the district court’s preliminary injunction only; the Court’s decision allows for the possibility of further litigation in this case.”

The organization stipulated that the court did not rule that schools cannot require masking to protect students with disabilities.

“Today’s decision interprets the new state law to mean that schools can still require masking for students with disabilities that make them particularly susceptible to COVID, under federal disability rights laws,” it said. “Bottom line: Iowa schools can still require and Iowa parents can still request masking as a reasonable accommodation for students with disabilities under appropriate circumstances.”

In her dissenting opinion, Circuit Court Judge Jane Kelly said parents can still seek accommodations for their children as the COVID-19 pandemic continues.

“Section 280.31 explicitly includes an exception when ‘any other provision of law’ requires face coverings,” she said. “Schools are equipped to determine on an individualized, case-by-case basis – just as schools do for any other type of reasonable accommodation request – whether a mask requirement for certain people or places in the school building is a reasonable accommodation under the ADA and RA. This is what federal law requires, and what Section 280.31 – and Defendants who are charged with enforcing it – must allow.”

Tags: 8th Circuit Court of AppealsACLU of IowaDuane BentonJane Kellymask mandate banmask mandatesRalph Erickson
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Absentee voting period begins in Iowa for June 7 primary

Next Post

Grassley: Democrats are deepening the political divide

Mary Stroka

Mary Stroka

Mary Stoka is a freelance writer, editor, journalist, and public relations professional who lives in Chicago, Ill.

Related Posts

Cedar Rapids brings back mask mandate for city buildings
Local Government

Cedar Rapids brings back mask mandate for city buildings

July 20, 2022
Iowa Supreme Court rules there is no right to abortion in state constitution
State Government

Iowa Supreme Court rules there is no right to abortion in state constitution

June 17, 2022
teacher teaching her students
Federal Government

Miller-Meeks introduces resolution to unmask students

April 21, 2022
State Government

Iowa Supreme Court upholds gender identity discrimination verdict favoring former state employee

April 1, 2022
Local Government

Des Moines ends mask mandate for city buildings

February 28, 2022
Group Calls Scott County’s Use of ARPA Funds for Juvenile Detention Facility Unlawful
Local Government

Group Calls Scott County’s Use of ARPA Funds for Juvenile Detention Facility Unlawful

February 5, 2022
Next Post
Grassley: Big Victories for Rural Healthcare

Grassley: Democrats are deepening the political divide

Reynolds Launches New Teacher and Paraeducator Registered Apprenticeship

Reynolds endorses two pro-school choice Iowa House candidates

Sign-Up For Our Daily Updates

Get The Iowa Torch right in your inbox!

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recommended Articles

Hendrickson: Iowa Should Look to North Carolina’s Transformational Tax Reform

December 23, 2021

Proposed Life Amendment to Iowa Constitution Clears First Hurdle

May 20, 2021

Two bills Feenstra introduced pass in the U.S. House

July 28, 2022

Popular Stories

  • elderly couple walking on a flower field

    Sherman: Iowa can fight back against the Biden Administration’s attack on retirees and families

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • School restroom bill heads to Reynolds’ desk

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ernst: Biden’s WOTUS whiplash.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Horn: It’s time for employers get serious about Iowa’s untapped workforce

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Reynolds signs two bills addressing transgender children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.