• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home State Government

Iowa Senate Panel Advances Gun Rights Amendment

SJR 1, a constitutional amendment that will enshrine Iowans' right to keep and bear arms in the Iowa Constitution, passed out of an Iowa Senate subcommittee.

Shane Vander HartbyShane Vander Hart
January 21, 2021
in State Government
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Iowa Senate Panel Advances Gun Rights Amendment

From Left: State Senators Tony Bisignano, D-Des Moines, Brad Zaun, R-Urbandale, and Jason Schultz, R-Schleswig

DES MOINES, Iowa – SJR 1, a constitutional amendment that will enshrine Iowans’ right to keep and bear arms in the Iowa Constitution, passed out of an Iowa Senate subcommittee on Thursday morning. The amendment passed last year during the 88th General Assembly. It will need to pass both the Iowa House and Iowa Senate before voters decide whether to ratify the amendment or not. 

RELATED POSTS

Attorney General Bird leads challenge to California’s diesel truck ban

Pate, ‘Election Security A Team’ reassure voters of Iowa’s election integrity

Reynolds announces $6.5 million in new round of Destination Iowa funding

The amendment’s language reads, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The sovereign state of Iowa affirms and recognizes this right to be a fundamental individual right. Any and all restrictions of this right shall be subject to strict scrutiny.”

The subcommittee included State Senators Brad Zaun, R-Urbandale, Tony Bisignano, D-Des Moines, and Jason Schultz, R-Schleswig. Zaun and Schultz supported the bill, Bisignano did not. 

The Iowa House already moved their companion bill out of committee, passing by a 13 to 6 vote in the Iowa House Public Safety Committee on Thursday afternoon.

Most of the public feedback during the Thursday morning subcommittee opposed the bill, and most of the criticism was directed to the strict scrutiny requirement.

Leslie Carpenter, who advocates for Iowans who are mentally ill, stated that 79 percent of Iowa’s gun deaths are suicides. 

“This constitutional amendment would limit ability for sensible gun legislation, which most Iowans and most gun owners support to prevent unnecessary gun deaths,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Erin Fletcher, who identified herself as a veteran, gun owner, and mom who recently moved from Missouri, opposed the amendment. She said Missouri added similar language to their constitution. 

“They saw an increase in gun violence, and also it cost the state a tremendous amount of money, figuring out in the courts, whether that was going to preempt the state from prohibiting felons from having weapons and things like that,” she said.

Tracy Kennedy, another mother who also recently moved from Missouri, made similar remarks. 

Missouri released a report in 2019 showing a 56.4 percent increase in gun-related deaths in the state from 2008 to 2018. It did not discuss the cause; the Missouri Foundation for Health commissioned a study to ascertain what led to the increase. Missouri voters approved Amendment 5 in 2014 by 61 percent of the vote, and the state’s supreme court upheld the amendment in 2015.

Missouri’s amendment reads, “The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. Any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny and the state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the general assembly from enacting general laws which limit the rights of convicted violent felons or those adjudicated by a court to be a danger to self or others as result of a mental disorder or mental infirmity.”

Charlotte Eby representing Giffords agreed that their research shows Iowa is one of six states that doesn’t have language mirroring the Second Amendment in its state constitution. But she added that only three states require strict scrutiny – Alabama, Louisiana, and Missouri – calling the language “extreme.”

Connie Ryan of Interfaith Alliance of Iowa agreed.

“Adding gun rights with strict scrutiny to the Iowa Constitution would place all of Iowa’s common-sense gun safety laws, and future legislation in danger of being struck down by the court, placing Iowans in harm’s way,” she said.

Ryan said that laws prohibiting felons from owning or carrying a gun, background checks, the prohibition to carry on school grounds, the requirement to obtain a permit to carry, and handgun training requirements for initial permits could all be impacted by the amendment.

Bisignano, who sided with gun control advocates, said that the amendment would not be controversial without the strict scrutiny language. 

“I’m just concerned that there’s so much enthusiasm for this extremism on the Second Amendment,” he said. 

“I just think people are comfortable with our Second Amendment rights. No, oh, they’ve been expanded tremendously in the past several years. And to take this extreme to get into one or two states is extremism. I don’t ever have a desire; I got to honestly say, I have no desire to ever be on a list with Alabama and Louisiana,” Bisignano stated.

Richard Rogers with the Iowa Firearms Coalition disagreed. 

“There’s nothing radical about supporting the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights. The courts, the Supreme Court included, recognize that the right to keep bear arms is a fundamental individual right. That pre-exists the constitution, is not granted by the constitution, the constitution attempts to protect those rights for the individuals,” he said.

Rogers addressed strict scrutiny. 

“This amendment was drafted in this manner out of necessity, as we’ve seen a century or more of legalistic attempts to circumvent or obfuscate the clear historically supportable meaning of the Second Amendment,” he noted.

Rogers added that the amendment does not call into question laws that are not considered an infringement.

Schultz, who said he would sign approving the bill, said the complaints brought up by gun control advocates gets at the heart of why the amendment is necessary.

“The point of this is to restrict future gun control bills. That’s why you put it in the constitution. Constitutions bind governments; they bind and protect the rights of citizens. That’s why you put it here. My intent here is that the firearms rights are protected in Iowa’s constitution, and those who wish to have the Federal Constitution, Second Amendment language are doing so because they have seen the courts watered down an amendment that includes the words shall not be infringed. I intend that Iowa’s constitution effectively does not allow infringement. I believe freedom is the answer,” he said.

“I believe that rights are rights. I believe they’re equal and therefore should be protected to the same standard. I would want First Amendment rights, freedom of speech, specifically, to be to be defended to a level of strict scrutiny,” Schultz added.

Zaun, who spoke in support of the constitutional amendment, pointed out that the constitutional amendment has already passed in two general assemblies but had to be considered this year due to a mistake made by the Iowa Secretary of State’s office.

Ultimately, he said, the citizens of Iowa will decide on this constitutional amendment.

Listen to the full subcommittee hearing below:

Tags: 2021 Iowa Legislative Session89th General AssemblyBrad ZaunConnie RyanGiffordsgun rightsInterfaith Alliance of IowaIowa ConstitutionIowa Firearms CoalitionIowa SenateJason SchultzRichard RogersTony Bisignano
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

AG: Pandemic and Derecho Help Boost Consumer Complaints 24.4 Percent

Next Post

Reynolds Addresses Iowa’s COVID-19 Vaccine Shortage

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of The Iowa Torch.

Related Posts

Reynolds signs bill phasing in 3.9 percent flat tax
Opinion

Hendrickson: Iowa – the gold standard leader in state tax reform

July 27, 2023
State Government

The Iowa House and Senate pass different property tax relief bills

April 20, 2023
Vander Hart: Two Reasons Iowans May Still Want a Carry Permit
State Government

Iowa House passes bill allowing firearms in vehicles at schools and public buildings

April 13, 2023
white tiled wall with men s restroom sign
State Government

School restroom bill heads to Reynolds’ desk

March 20, 2023
Iowa’s New Unemployment Rate Holds Steady, Overall Rates Rise
Opinion

Horn: It’s time for employers get serious about Iowa’s untapped workforce

March 17, 2023
Iowa lawmakers approve prohibiting ‘gender transitioning procedures’ for minors
State Government

Iowa lawmakers approve prohibiting ‘gender transitioning procedures’ for minors

March 9, 2023
Next Post
Reynolds Addresses Iowa’s COVID-19 Vaccine Shortage

Reynolds Addresses Iowa's COVID-19 Vaccine Shortage

Donor Privacy Bill in Iowa House Finds Support Across Ideological Spectrum

Donor Privacy Bill in Iowa House Finds Support Across Ideological Spectrum

Sign-Up For Our Daily Updates

Get The Iowa Torch right in your inbox!

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recommended Articles

Iowa Elected Officials Demand EPA Action on Biofuels

Iowa elected officials urge EPA to allow year-round E15 sales

April 5, 2022
Reynolds Appoints Meghan Corbin as District Court Judge

Reynolds Applauds Injunction Stopping Vaccine Mandate for Fed Contractors

December 8, 2021

A Look At The Second Redistricting Map

October 22, 2021

Popular Stories

  • crime scene do not cross signage

    FBI report shows violent crime in Iowa is down

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Vivek Ramaswamy launches first ad of presidential campaign in Iowa, New Hampshire

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ramaswamy campaign announces Matt Schultz as Iowa co-chairman

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Pro-Haley super PAC drops first TV ad in Iowa

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Feenstra: Expanding behavioral health services for our farmers and rural communities

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Current Events
  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.