• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Thursday, March 23, 2023
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home State Government

Iowa Supreme Court Prohibits Warrantless Searches of Garbage

The Iowa Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, ruled that warrantless searches of trash cans outside people's homes constituted an unreasonable search and seizure.

Shane Vander HartbyShane Vander Hart
June 22, 2021
in State Government
Reading Time: 4 mins read

RELATED POSTS

Reynolds signs two bills addressing transgender children

School restroom bill heads to Reynolds’ desk

Iowa House sends government reorganization bill to Reynolds’ desk

DES MOINES, Iowa – The Iowa Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision on Friday, ruled that warrantless searches of trash cans outside people’s homes constituted an unreasonable search and seizure.

The defendant, Nicholas Dean Wright, who resides in Clear Lake, appealed a judgment and sentence entered on his convictions of possession of marijuana and possession of Vyvanse. He contended the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a warrantless search of his garbage containers set out for trash collection.

Justice Christopher McDonald, writing for the majority, stated that Clear Lake Police Officer Brandon Heinz “on three occasions, during the dark of night, without probable cause or a warrant, went into the alley behind Wright’s residence to take Wright’s garbage bags and search through them to ‘obtain information about what Mr. Wright may have been doing inside [his] house.'”

Probable cause for a search warrant Heinz applied for was predicated on the evidence obtained from the warrantless seizure and search of Wright’s trash bags. The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to deny a motion to suppress evidence because the trash cans were in an alley, not on Wright’s property.

Article I, Section 8 of the Iowa Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable seizures and searches shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized.”

“(W)e have long held that a peace officer engaged in general criminal investigation acted unreasonably and unlawfully when he trespassed against a citizen without first obtaining a warrant based on probable cause,” McDonald wrote.

He cited case law that demonstrated the prohibition of unlawful searches and seizures extended outside the home. Both the Iowa Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court had moved away from historical seizure and search jurisprudence but has returned to that interpretation.

“This court and the Supreme Court’s return to the historical understandings of seizure and search jurisprudence, to some degree, was born of necessity. Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is a mess,” McDonald stated.

“A survey of the relevant text, history, and precedents shows article I, section 8’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures was tied to common law trespass. In light of that understanding, we hold a peace officer engaged in general criminal investigation acts unreasonably under article I, section 8 when the peace officer commits a trespass against a citizen’s house, papers, or effects without first obtaining a warrant based ‘on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized,'” he wrote.

McDonald found that Wright did not abandon “all right, title, and interest in the property” because abandonment entails relinquishing ownership interests without regard of who becomes the next owner. Clear Lake city ordinance says it is unlawful for anyone other than a licensed contractor under a contract with the city to remove garbage.

“In moving his trash to the alley for collection, Wright agreed only to convey his property to a licensed collector,” he wrote. “Wright would have the right to retrieve the property prior to collection and the right to exclude all others from rummaging through his garbage bins prior to collection.”

“Of course, this is not to say article I, section 8 rises and falls based on a particular municipal law. Municipal laws, like all positive laws, are merely one form of evidence of the limits of a peace officer’s authority to act without a warrant,” McDonald added. “Article I, section 8 precludes a peace officer from engaging in general criminal investigation that constitutes a trespass against a citizen’s house, papers, or effects. No department of the government can circumvent this constitutional minimum.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He wrote that police efficiency isn’t justification for violating a person’s constitutional rights.

“We do not question the utility of warrantless trash grabs for the purposes of law enforcement, but the utility of warrantless activity is not the issue under our constitution,” McDonald wrote.

McDonald was joined by Justices Dana Oxley, Matthew McDermott, and Brent Appel. Appel wrote a concurring opinion because he disagreed with McDonald’s application of constitutional history, making an originalist argument, even though he agreed with McDonald’s findings.

Chief Justice Susan Christensen dissented and was joined by Justices Thomas Waterman and Edward Mansfield.

“The Iowa Constitution does not provide greater protections than the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the warrantless search of garbage set out for collection in a publicly accessible area such that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his garbage. Additionally, the defendant’s garbage is not a constitutionally protected ‘effect’ under the Federal and State Constitutions, so I cannot conclude the officer violated Wright’s search and seizure protections by retrieving Wright’s garbage,” she wrote.

Christensen noted that Wright did not retain control of his garbage and that Heinz never left the publicly accessible alley to collect the trash.

She noted that the majority’s opinion “flies in the face of the United States Supreme Court and calls into question the constitutionality of many of our laws currently allowing law enforcement officers to take certain actions during investigations that private citizens cannot take.”

Christensen pointed out that federal law enforcement and law enforcement in a majority of states can lawfully conduct warrantless searches of garbage set out for collection.

Waterman wrote his own dissenting opinion that Christensen and Mansfield joined.

“The majority’s new de facto test—if a private citizen can’t search discarded trash, the police can’t do it either—has never been recognized by any court or dissent in the country,” he said. “That is not surprising. The test makes little sense. Police officers can do many things private citizens cannot.”

“The majority is guilty of faux originalism, ‘living’ constitutionalism, and ahistorical analysis. The majority finds no support for its newly concocted test in the Federalist Papers or the debates at the Iowa constitutional convention. Those sources are neither confronted nor consulted to test its false premise that law enforcement historically could not search garbage,” Waterman argued.

Mansfield also wrote a separate dissenting opinion that Christensen and Waterman joined.

“To me, this case begins and ends with the syllogism that trash is trash. It is nobody’s property; it has been voluntarily abandoned. Nicholas Wright put his two garbage cans out for collection next to a public alley without lids on them. If a private citizen had pulled something out of those cans, Wright would have no cause of action against that citizen,” he wrote.

Read the majority opinion, concurrent opinion, and dissenting opinions below:

190180_13B0B1758D38D
Tags: Brent AppelChristopher McDonaldDana OxleyEdward MansfieldFourteenth AmendmentFourth AmendmentIowa ConstitutionIowa Supreme CourtMatthew McDermottseizure and search jurisprudenceSusan ChristensenThomas WatermanU.S. Supreme Court
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Grassley, Judiciary Committee GOP Press DOJ on Response to IRS Leak

Next Post

Council Bluffs, Cedar Rapids, and Waterloo Test Iowa Drive-Thru Sites Close This Week

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of The Iowa Torch.

Related Posts

Christensen reselected as Chief Justice of Iowa Supreme Court
State Government

Christensen reselected as Chief Justice of Iowa Supreme Court

January 3, 2023
State Government

District Court Judge declines to unblock fetal heartbeat abortion ban

December 12, 2022
Lawmakers, Gun Rights Advocates Commemorate 49th Amendment to Iowa Constitution
State Government

Lawmakers, Gun Rights Advocates Commemorate 49th Amendment to Iowa Constitution

December 11, 2022
Vander Hart: Two Reasons Iowans May Still Want a Carry Permit
Politics

Eleven county sheriffs endorse proposed gun rights constitutional amendment

November 2, 2022
Iowa Firearms Coalition releases first ad promoting proposed amendment
Politics

Iowa Firearms Coalition releases first ad promoting proposed amendment

September 14, 2022
Reynolds Appoints Meghan Corbin as District Court Judge
State Government

Reynolds files motion to challenge injunction on Iowa’s fetal heartbeat abortion ban

August 12, 2022
Next Post
Test Iowa Program to End Operations on July 16

Council Bluffs, Cedar Rapids, and Waterloo Test Iowa Drive-Thru Sites Close This Week

Reynolds Orders Creation of Carbon Sequestration Task Force

Sign-Up For Our Daily Updates

Get The Iowa Torch right in your inbox!

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recommended Articles

Iowa Firearms Coalition releases first ad promoting proposed amendment

Iowa Firearms Coalition releases first ad promoting proposed amendment

September 14, 2022
Iowa Elected Officials Demand EPA Action on Biofuels

Ernst: Biden’s Biofuel Agenda Will Amount to ‘Promises Made, Promises Broken’

December 10, 2021
Iowa Delegation Urges Vilsack to Expand COVID-19 Aid Programs for Iowa’s Family Cattle Feeders

Iowa Delegation Urges Vilsack to Expand COVID-19 Aid Programs for Iowa’s Family Cattle Feeders

February 24, 2021

Popular Stories

  • Iowa’s New Unemployment Rate Holds Steady, Overall Rates Rise

    Horn: It’s time for employers get serious about Iowa’s untapped workforce

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • School restroom bill heads to Reynolds’ desk

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ernst: Biden’s WOTUS whiplash.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Regents Board President pauses new DEI programs at Iowa’s public universities

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Reynolds signs two bills addressing transgender children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.