• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Tuesday, July 5, 2022
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home Federal Government

Chuck Grassley: Big Tech Must Stop Censoring Americans

Chuck Grassley: "It’s time that we examine the need for Section 230 immunity and to what extent these tech companies are abusing their monopoly power."

Iowa TorchbyIowa Torch
April 12, 2021
in Federal Government
Reading Time: 3 mins read

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, spoke on the United States Senate floor on Monday to address big tech companies’ censorship of Americans and suggested that it is time for Congress to revisit whether they should have immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

RELATED POSTS

Iowa’s members of Congress react to Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade

Eighth Circuit Court lifts preliminary injunction of Iowa mask mandate ban

Ernst introduces bill to move federal agencies out of D.C.

Watch his remarks above and read the transcript of his remarks below:

“I recently spoke on the Senate floor about the importance of free speech. Today I’d like to speak on the power of Big Tech to censor free speech. 

“It has been 25 years since Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was signed into law. This law grants wide sweeping immunity to interactive computer services that host third party content.

“The goal of Section 230 was laudable. The internet was in its infancy and content being posted to message boards by third parties was leading to litigation that threatened the spread of free speech and expression. Section 230 was enacted to encourage free speech while giving companies the ability to remove illegal or obscene materials. Section 230 and the legal shield it offers helped to enable the internet to grow into what we have today.

“However, interactive computer services are no longer struggling companies but some of the largest corporations in the world today. When Section 230 was signed into law, Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube did not exist. Today they’re dominant tech giants.

“Many argue that these private companies have their own terms of service and are able to enforce them as they wish. That they’re not covered under the first amendment. Yet these platforms are now the new public square where it’s important that all voices and viewpoints are able to be heard. With the immunities that these companies have and the importance of dialogue on their platforms, arguably they are in effect state actors and therefore first amendment protections should apply to user generated content.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The size and power of these companies also contributes to their ability to censor speech and undermine the first amendment. Google controls 87 percent of search, Facebook has 2.8 billion monthly active users, 500 million tweets are sent on Twitter each day and over 1 billion hours of videos are watched on YouTube every day.

“When a company has monopoly power, it no longer is constrained by normal market forces. If these platforms had competitors, consumers could choose alternatives when they disagree with terms of service or moderation policies. Right now the only choice consumers have is to take it or leave it.

“Section 230 appears to compound this problem. Big tech has no competitors and is immune from liability. These companies are unaccountable to their customers, the courts and the government. If not for their monopoly power and Section 230 immunity, these companies might not be involved in the actions and censorship we see today.

“These platforms are where people communicate online and there are no real alternatives. This innovation has democratized our political system; yet there are people who don’t like that every person is able to get their views out there and they want to interfere with and censor that. We cannot stand for this cancel culture and the interference with free speech.

“Entrepreneurs want to challenge these big tech companies. Unfortunately the system is rigged against the little guy startup. These companies can remove your website from the internet, delete your app from the app store or permanently ban you from their platform. They can remove competitors or those they disagree with, largely with no recourse.

“Millions of small business owners use tech platforms to operate their business. Many have been censored, banned and demonetized. This can be done without warning, no explanation and many times without any meaningful due process.

“Our antitrust regulators need to take a harder look at the actions of Big Tech. I recently introduced legislation with Senator Klobuchar to increase resources for FTC and DOJ antitrust enforcement. This legislation would provide an immediate boost to their effective competition responsibilities.

“Right now there are essentially five companies within the United States that determine what can and cannot be viewed by the American public. It’s becoming increasingly clear that these companies are more beholden to cancel culture and not to the free speech principles that this country was founded upon. As Justice Brandeis famously wrote, “If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”

“It’s time that we examine the need for Section 230 immunity and to what extent these tech companies are abusing their monopoly power. It’s time that these companies stop arbitrarily deciding what speech is acceptable for the country.”

Tags: 117th CongressBig TechCensorshipChuck GrassleyCommunications Decency Actfree speechSection 230U.S. Senate
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Iowa Senate Panel Advances Bill Doubling Adoption Tax Credit

Next Post

Iowa House Appropriations Committee Debates Over Funding for Regent Universities

Iowa Torch

Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans.

Related Posts

the united states capitol building in washington
Federal Government

Iowa’s members of Congress react to Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade

June 25, 2022
Ernst: World War II Army Ranger vets finally get the honor they deserve
Opinion

Ernst: World War II Army Ranger vets finally get the honor they deserve

June 13, 2022
Grassley, Franken win primaries in Iowa’s U.S. Senate race
Politics

Grassley, Franken win primaries in Iowa’s U.S. Senate race

June 8, 2022
Grassley: Big Victories for Rural Healthcare
Opinion

Grassley: Democrats are deepening the political divide

May 19, 2022
Ernst Calls for Responsible Spending, Criticizes Biden’s Budget Proposal
Federal Government

Ernst introduces bill to move federal agencies out of D.C.

May 13, 2022
the united states capitol building in washington
Federal Government

Ernst, Grassley vote against bill codifying abortion rights

May 11, 2022
Next Post
Iowa House Committee Passes Bill Eliminating Tenure at Regent Universities

Iowa House Appropriations Committee Debates Over Funding for Regent Universities

Iowa to Pause Administering Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine

Iowa to Pause Administering Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine

Sign-Up For Our Daily Updates

Get The Iowa Torch right in your inbox!

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recommended Articles

Indianola Residents Will Have Another Chance to Voice Their Objection to Sales Tax

Indianola Residents Will Have Another Chance to Voice Their Objection to Sales Tax

June 16, 2021

Iowa House Republicans Propose $20 Million Increase for Dept. of Corrections

April 6, 2021
Ernst: Protecting Troops, Saving Tax Dollars, and Maintaining Our National Defense.

Ernst: Protecting Troops, Saving Tax Dollars, and Maintaining Our National Defense.

December 12, 2020

Popular Stories

  • Schultz: Governor Highlights Successes in Western Iowa

    Reynolds to ask Iowa Courts to reconsider recent abortion rulings

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Iowa employers say attracting a quality workforce is a top priority

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Axne attacks Nunn in first campaign ad

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Several Republican incumbent lawmakers lose primaries

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bill Gustoff Announces Campaign for Iowa House District 40

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.