• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Thursday, May 8, 2025
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Ginn and Hendrickson: We Need Calvin Coolidge’s Fiscal Conservatism

Vance Ginn and John Hendrickson: Policymakers should follow President Calvin Coolidge’s example and reduce spending.

Vance GinnJohn HendricksonbyVance GinnandJohn Hendrickson
August 20, 2021
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Ginn and Hendrickson: We Need Calvin Coolidge’s Fiscal Conservatism

The national debt is rapidly nearing $29 trillion, which is 25 percent more than our entire economy, and is orders of magnitude higher if you consider unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare. This threatens life as we know it and must be addressed now.

RELATED POSTS

Feenstra: Lowering the cost of childcare for our families

Grassley: History informs farm policies of today

Hendrickson: Iowa taxpayers win big in 2024

Since the start of 2020, the debt has increased by $5.2 trillion. And President Joe Biden has called for $6 trillion in new spending along with massive tax hikes that will hinder growth and add trillions more in debt. The most recent spending plans are the $1.2 trillion “infrastructure” bill, which is really a green-energy boondoggle, and the at least $3.5 trillion reconciliation package that has been described as “human infrastructure,” which greatly expands the welfare state.

This expansion of the welfare state is far more than President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal or President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society. Although these initiatives likely had good intentions, the results were a disaster with the former driving the Great Depression deeper and longer and the latter contributing to greater dependency and rising structural deficits. 

President Biden’s Green New Deal would fundamentally transform America into something it is not, nor can it afford to be. Many progressives argue that the federal government can continue to deficit spend without consequence. While we expect this from progressives, where are the conservatives? 

ADVERTISEMENT

Both political parties share the blame for the rising burden of government that comes from excessive government spending. 

For example, 19 Senate Republicans voted for the $1.2 trillion “infrastructure” bill that spends less than 10 percent on conventional infrastructure such as roads and bridges.

The political calculus of this maneuver by Republicans is awful and troubling as Americans need elected officials to take fiscal responsibility seriously now. A great example is that by President Calvin Coolidge, who believed in the morality of a limited government and was the ultimate budget hawk. 

Coolidge, along with his predecessor, President Warren Harding, made cutting government spending a priority. When Harding assumed office, he was confronted with the Depression of 1920-1921 and his response was to fight it by removing government obstacles of excessive spending and taxing, which helped get the U.S. out of that situation in a hurry. After Harding’s death, Coolidge continued Harding’s pro-growth fiscal conservatism as Coolidge regarded “a good budget as among the noblest monuments of virtue.” 

For Coolidge, keeping a balanced budget with spending restraint and reasonable tax rates was not just sound economic policy but moral and constitutional, as it supported increased economic prosperity along with preserving life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 

Under President Coolidge, federal spending decreased by 0.4 percent, from $3.14 billion in 1923 to $3.13 billion in 1928. This means the budget declined by even more in inflation-adjusted terms and resulted in spending as a share of GDP declining from 3.7 percent to three percent, which compares with the astronomical $6.6 trillion for nearly one-third of GDP in 2020. As a result of cutting spending, Coolidge was able to lower the top income tax rate to 25 percent in 1926, as he noted that “You can’t increase prosperity by taxing success.”

The spending restraint, tax cuts, and faster economic growth helped the federal government run a budget surplus every year for a cumulative cut in the national debt over those seven years of $6.1 billion. As a result of Coolidge’s fiscal conservatism, the nation experienced the Roaring ‘20s because free-market capitalism was allowed to work much more than today. 

“The very fact that the federal government has been able to cut down expenditures, decrease its indebtedness and reduce its taxes indicates how great is the accomplishment which you have made on behalf of the people of the nation,” noted Coolidge.

Although the budget has changed since Coolidge was in office, Amity Shlaes, noted historian and Coolidge biographer, wrote that “the pressure to expand programs was as strong [then] as it is today.” 

Policymakers should follow Coolidge’s example and reduce spending. States such as Texas and Iowa have also proved that fiscal conservatism works, so the federal government should now do the same. The Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Responsible American Budget provides a blueprint to restoring fiscal sanity in Washington. 

Excessive government spending and the national debt cannot be ignored. If America doesn’t change course quick, there will be catastrophic results for Americans and Western Civilization. This is not just dangerous; it is un-American and something that will keep us from leaving a legacy to be proud of.  

We need Calvin Coolidge’s fiscal conservatism more than ever. 

Continue Reading
Tags: Calvin Coolidgefiscal conservatismfiscal policynational debt
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Ernst, Grassley Join Colleagues in Pressing Pentagon on Status of U.S. Military Equipment in Afghanistan

Next Post

Biden Plan Could Force Iowa Family Farms to Sell to Pay Federal Tax

Vance Ginn

Vance Ginn

Vance Ginn, Ph.D., is the chief economist with the Texas Public Policy Foundation based in Austin, Texas. He is the former chief economist of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) during the Trump administration.

John Hendrickson

John Hendrickson

John Hendrickson is the Policy Director for ITR Foundation.

Related Posts

Hendrickson: The wisdom of Andrew Mellon, a lesson in pro-growth economic policy
Opinion

Hendrickson: The wisdom of Andrew Mellon, a lesson in pro-growth economic policy

April 18, 2024
Opinion

Henrickson & Everson: Iowa’s historic tax reform opporutnity

February 29, 2024
Opinion

Hendrickson: Governor Kim Reynolds outlines a pro-growth agenda

January 18, 2024
Opinion

Hendrickson: Thanks to the fiscal conservatism of Governor Reynolds Iowa’s fiscal house is strong

January 5, 2024
Ginn and Hendrickson: We Need Calvin Coolidge’s Fiscal Conservatism
Opinion

Hendrickson: Ron DeSantis takes inspiration from Calvin Coolidge

December 16, 2023
Iowa vs. Minnesota: Neighboring states show different futures for America
Opinion

Hendrickson & Phelan: The Future of State Fiscal Policy

December 5, 2023
Next Post
Grassley: Inheritance Taxes Are Bad for Farm Economy

Biden Plan Could Force Iowa Family Farms to Sell to Pay Federal Tax

Iowa’s New Unemployment Rate Holds Steady, Overall Rates Rise

Iowa’s Unemployment Rate Increases to 4.1 Percent in July, Labor Participation Continues to Rise

Recommended Articles

Spirit Lake School Board approves measure to arm school staff

Spirit Lake School Board approves measure to arm school staff

August 24, 2022
Grassley: U.S. Military Placed In ‘Impossible Situation’ During Afghanistan Exit

Grassley: U.S. Military Placed In ‘Impossible Situation’ During Afghanistan Exit

September 16, 2021
Photo by Matt Owen (CC-By-SA 2.0)

NASCAR expected to bring millions into Iowa

October 5, 2023

Popular Stories

  • Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Editorial: Johnston School Board can’t legally deny a TPUSA chapter

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Rozenboom: Reflecting on the First Week of the 2021 Legislative Session

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Hendrickson: John Calvin’s contribution to liberty

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Iowa Dept. of Health & Human Services fill two leadership roles

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Current Events
  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government

Newsletter

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.