• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Saturday, May 10, 2025
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home State Government

Bill Banning Racial and Sex Stereotyping in Taxpayer-Funded Diversity Training Heads to Governor’s Desk

The Iowa Legislature passed a bill that prohibits racial and sex stereotyping and scapegoating in diversity training by local governments and public schools and colleges.

Shane Vander HartbyShane Vander Hart
May 7, 2021
in State Government
Reading Time: 5 mins read

DES MOINES, Iowa – The Iowa House passed HF 802, a bill that prohibits racial and sex stereotyping and scapegoating as part of diversity training offered by local governments, public school districts, and public institutions of higher learning. 

RELATED POSTS

Reynolds signs bill enacting flat tax in 2025

Reynolds joins bipartisan opposition to Biden Administration’s Space Force proposal

Iowa lawmakers enact flat tax for 2025

The Iowa House initially passed the bill on March 16 by a 59 to 38 vote. The Iowa Senate amended and passed the bill last week by 30 to 18 vote. The vote in both chambers split along party lines, with Republicans voting in favor of the legislation and Democrats voting against it. The bill now heads to Gov. Kim Reynolds.

The bill prohibits “race and sex stereotyping” in diversity training, defined as:

  • Ascribing character traits, values, moral and ethical codes, status, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of the individual’s race or sex. 
  • Assigning fault, blame, or bias to a race or sex, or to members of a race or sex because of their race or sex, or claiming that, consciously or unconsciously, and by virtue of persons’ race or sex, members of any race are inherently racist or are inherently inclined to oppress others, or that members of a sex are inherently sexist or inclined to oppress others.

The bill prohibits explicitly prohibits certain “specifically defined concepts” from diversity training unless their discussion is required for context.

  • That one race or sex is inherently better than another race or sex. 
  • That the United States or the state of Iowa is fundamentally racist or sexist
  • By virtue of the individual’s race or sex, an individual is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. 
  • That an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of the individual’s race or sex
  • That members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex. 
  • That an individual’s race or sex necessarily determines an individual’s moral character. 
  • By virtue of their race or sex, an individual bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex.
  • That any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress because of that individual’s race or sex
  • That meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist or were created by a particular race to oppress another race.

News reports of the Iowa Senate’s amendment led Democrats to charge falsely and the media to report that the Iowa Senate wanted to ban certain types of the curriculum. 

Cynthia Fodor with KCCI News reported last week, “Opponents are now concerned it could eliminate teaching part of our history. A new amendment added to the bill states it would ‘prohibit curriculum that teaches the topics of sexism, slavery, racial oppression and segregation.'”

The language at issue in the amendment reads, “Prohibit the use of curriculum that teaches the topics of sexism, slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, or racial discrimination, including topics relating to the enactment and enforcement of laws resulting in sexism, racial oppression, segregation, and discrimination.”

Those complaining about this language missed where the amendment instructed the language to be placed. It reads, “Page 2, inserting after line 19 by inserting.” 

See screenshots:

Screenshot of amendment with the instructions of where it will be placed.
Screenshot of where the amended language will be placed in the bill.

When the amended version of the bill is available, that amendment language will appear as the fourth item (item “d”) in a list of things that the bill says, “This section shall not be construed to do any of the following.” 

The amended legislation will say the exact opposite of what opponents claimed it would do. The Iowa Senate wanted to clarify those topics in a curriculum will NOT be prohibited by this bill should it become law.

State Rep. Steven Holt, R-Denison, the floor manager of the bill, criticized KCCI’s reporting explaining the context of the amendment. 

“The amendment must be read in the context of where the language fits in the bill. I believe that the bill we originally passed was already clear on this, but (the Iowa Senate) wanted to be more specific, and I’m certainly okay with that,” he said. “Of course, these issues must be taught, they must be discussed, and they can be without scapegoating entire groups of people.”

State Rep. Mary Wolfe, D-Clinton, agreed with Holt that the Senate amendment did not change the bill substantively. She didn’t believe adding that language made the bill better.

“The fact that the Senate felt more comfortable, explicitly spelling out what the bill doesn’t do, even though it sounds like the bill does that. We’re gonna put language in there that says, ‘no, this is what it looks like it does, but it doesn’t really do.’ That’s some problematic drafting, and ultimately, as far as the Supreme Court is concerned, they’re gonna look at what the bill says, and the bill says that it does something and the fact that we say, later in the bill that it doesn’t do that, that I’m not sure that that’s going to cure the problem. So basically, again, I agree there’s been a lot of press on this bill, and it has not reflected well, on this body or on Iowa in general, in my opinion. I think it’s unfortunate that the Senate did not improve the bill but instead sought to make itself more comfortable by just changing the words around and not really making the bill any better,” she said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

During his closing comments, Holt countered and said that agreeing with the Senate amendment isn’t “about making the Senate happy, it’s about getting things done.” 

“You seem to be suggesting Representative Wolfe in order to teach about racism and oppression and all the mistakes we’ve made in our history; we have to use these divisive concepts. And I categorically reject that. We don’t have to use racism to teach against racism. We don’t have to be racist and scapegoat entire groups of people in order to teach against racism. We don’t have to teach that the United States of America and the state of Iowa are systematically racist or sexist in 2021,” he said. 

Tags: 2021 Iowa Legislative Session89th General AssemblyCynthia Fodordiversity trainingKCCI NewsMary WolfeSteven Holt
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Fallen Officers Remembered During 2021 Iowa Peace Officer Memorial

Next Post

Hinson: People Getting Vaccinated Want to See a Light at the End of the Tunnel

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of The Iowa Torch.

Related Posts

Reynolds signs bill phasing in 3.9 percent flat tax
Opinion

Hendrickson: Iowa – the gold standard leader in state tax reform

July 27, 2023
State Government

Reynolds signs bill fixing 2021 property tax error

February 22, 2023
Ernst Expresses Concern About Trump’s Upcoming Senate Impeachment Trial
Opinion

Ernst: Democrats’ misplaced priorities are creating problems for the rest of America

September 23, 2022
Hendrickson: Fiscal Conservatism Works
Opinion

Hendrickson: A pro-taxpayer budget

June 8, 2022
Group Pushes for Tax Cuts with Iowa’s Projected Revenue Growth
State Government

The Iowa Legislature adjourns for the 2022 session.

May 25, 2022
State Government

Iowa House will not vote on school choice bill this year

May 24, 2022
Next Post

Hinson: People Getting Vaccinated Want to See a Light at the End of the Tunnel

Schultz: The Amendment That Doesn’t Do Anything

Schultz: Working to Ease Iowans' Tax Burden

Recommended Articles

Grassley Questions Attorney General Garland Over School Board Violence Memo

Grassley Questions Attorney General Garland Over School Board Violence Memo

October 28, 2021

Hinson Seeks to Restore Trump’s Deregulatory Agenda

April 13, 2021
Hinson Secures Federal Funding for Lock & Dam 10 in Guttenberg

Hinson Secures Federal Funding for Lock & Dam 10 in Guttenberg

June 4, 2021

Popular Stories

  • Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Rozenboom: Reflecting on the First Week of the 2021 Legislative Session

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Iowa Dept. of Health & Human Services fill two leadership roles

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Biden promotes E-15 expansion while visiting Iowa

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Fauci ends taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Current Events
  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government

Newsletter

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.