• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Thursday, May 8, 2025
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home State Government

Iowa House Passes Universal Parent-Taught Driver’s Education

The Iowa House of Representatives voted 59 to 34 to expand the parent-taught driver's education law to allow all parents with a valid driver's license to teach.

Shane Vander HartbyShane Vander Hart
April 14, 2021
in Education, State Government
Reading Time: 5 mins read

DES MOINES, Iowa – The Iowa House of Representatives passed an amended version of SF 546 on Monday evening by a 59 to 34 party-line vote. The amended legislation would give every parent in Iowa, with certain exceptions, the ability to teach their children driver’s education at home.

RELATED POSTS

Reynolds signs bill enacting flat tax in 2025

Reynolds joins bipartisan opposition to Biden Administration’s Space Force proposal

Iowa lawmakers enact flat tax for 2025

The legislation also clarifies the distinction between Competent Private Instruction (CPI) and Independent Private Instruction (IPI), two options for homeschooling in the state. It also changed reporting and evaluation dates for CPI students due to changes made with the state’s assessment.

When the Iowa Legislature passed parent-taught driver’s education, the bill’s language omitted IPI students, but the legislature’s intent at the time was to include them. Also, the Iowa Department of Education has since that bill passed has allowed IPI students to utilize parent-taught drivers’ education. The original bill would update the Iowa Code with the current Iowa DOT rules.

The bill also reduces the number of street and highway hours from 40 to 30. It states parents can work together to offer parent-taught driver’s education since the current homeschooling law allows parents to work in tandem with other subjects. 

During the Iowa Senate debate on this bill in the Iowa Senate, State Senator Tony Bisignano, D-Des Moines, complained that only homeschooling parents had the opportunity to teach drivers education. 

“So if you think you’re doing your kids a favor, you’re not. And to say to your kids are special, they’re not. And to ask the body to vote no what with no real defense of this because you truly are discriminating against kids who aren’t homeschooled,” he said. “You’re making parents have to go pay 2, 3, $400 for driving instruction. And all I ask is that you let parents, non-homeschooling parents, teach their own children to drive somehow what? That’s wrong? Somehow what? That’s not safe. This is discriminatory on its face.”

The amendment to the bill remedies that. 

Iowa House Democrats questioned parents’ ability to teach drivers education.

“So this is saying anyone that has a driver’s license can teach their child to drive. That’s what this is saying. And my point is, just because you have a valid driver’s license doesn’t mean you’re qualified to teach someone to drive,” State Rep. Sharon Steckman, D-Mason City, said. 

State Rep. Mary Mascher, D-Iowa City, said she was concerned with parents who had their licenses suspended teaching students to drive. 

“If someone has had a suspended license, even though they have gotten it back, it certainly doesn’t mean that they are qualified to teach their own child. And certainly, if they have a history of that, meaning it’s happened more than once or twice, then it seems to me again that isn’t necessarily the best person to be teaching a student,” she said.

The law prohibits someone who had their license suspended from providing parent-taught driver’s education for two years after their suspension is lifted.

“There are some valuable lessons being taught in drivers ed. And those courses are extremely important in order for students to be prepared behind the wheel. That wheel is a deadly weapon. And we know that because people are killed. When I drive in every day to Des Moines on Monday, I look at the sign that tells us how many deaths there have been in Iowa over the weekend or during the week. Right now, it’s 60 that we’ve seen so far this year alone. I don’t know how many of those are teen drivers. But we know our teen drivers do not have the same set of experience that adult drivers do. And I also know that adult drivers are not always good role models for their children,” Mascher argued.

State Rep. Eric Gjerde, D-Cedar Rapids, said that parents are sometimes poor role models for students. 

“I know that all of us, when we’re driving, and we pull up to a stoplight, have seen drivers do many different things. It might be shaving. It might be putting makeup on,” he said. “We know when we’ve had legislation come through subcommittee and committee here about texting and driving, kids see their parents do things. How difficult is it for a parent to say ‘well, you can’t text and drive’ when the student or the child sees their parent do that.”

The amendment was approved by a voice vote.

Steckman spoke again. She complained about the elimination of the time requirements for classroom instruction from the bill. 

“Currently, what this bill does is changed some guidelines. And the way it was explained to me at subcommittee is that ‘well, my kids, they do the online course.’ And they’re just sitting back waiting for it to be over because they already know it,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So part of the requirement is to have 30 hours of classroom instruction. Well, we got rid of that. They’re just going to have instruction, maybe five hours, maybe 15, whatever, I guess it doesn’t matter. It’s just driving a big lethal weapon, you know,” Steckman added.

She also complained about the current law that the state would only deny a parent from teaching drivers education to their students if they caused a motor vehicle accident that led to the serious injury or death of another person or had two accidents in a two-year period where they were at fault.

State Rep. Joel Fry, R-Osceola, the bill’s manager, corrected Steckman in his closing remarks. 

“Representative Steckman, moments ago, you were talking about those who maybe would be disqualified or related to who wouldn’t have a driver’s license. You did leave out some keywords in your reading of your definition, talking about habitual violators or habitual offenders. And there is some language in the code that describes them. So I’m a little shocked that you left certain words out as you’re reading the code to us,” he said. 

Fry also reminded Steckman about her complaint in the subcommittee that parent-taught driver’s education wasn’t available for all parents.

“I believe it was your idea that you brought forth about opening this up to all students and parents, you were quite frustrated about the fact that we weren’t offering this to everyone in the state. ‘And why would homeschoolers just get the opportunity to have this taught to them by their parents?'” he quoted. 

Fry said he offered to have her as a co-sponsor for the amendment, which she declined. 

He also argued that the bill does not change the substance of what is taught.

“I would also suggest to you that the Department of Transportation has the great opportunity to continue to evaluate all courses in which they offer. Today, they offer four different courses for students to take this online driver’s education. Nowhere in this legislation have we taken the authority away from the Department of Transportation and their expertise in what kind of curriculum they would offer for these courses,” Fry stated.

He also argued that parents, not the school, have a vested interest in making sure their children drive safely.

“I also believe that parents do have the ability to teach their children in many different ways, many different subjects. I, for one, have had the privilege of teaching now four children driver’s ed in my own family. And I can tell you, the amount of time that I spend with that child in drivers education far outweighs the amount of time I received when I went through drivers education in the school system: the attention to detail, the desire that I have to make sure that my child drives safely, because who’s going to pay the insurance and liability and all the damages that would incur, should they get in an accident? It’s me. It’s not the school. It’s me as the parent, so I have a very vested interest in how my child comes out of driver’s ed,” Fry said. 

The amended bill will return to the Iowa Senate for their consideration.

Tags: 2021 Iowa Legislative Session89th General AssemblyhomeschoolingIowa House of RepresentativesJoel FryMary MascherParent-Taught Drivers' EducationSharon SteckmanTony Bisignano
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Hinson Seeks to Restore Trump’s Deregulatory Agenda

Next Post

Axne: Iowa Vets to Receive $1,400 Payments from American Rescue Plan Beginning this Week

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of The Iowa Torch.

Related Posts

State Government

Reynolds signs bill eliminating gender balance requirement for appointed commissions and boards

April 5, 2024
Iowa House Passes ‘Back the Blue’ Legislation
State Government

Iowa House passes bill supporting law enforcement

March 26, 2024
Education

Iowa House sends changed AEA reform bill back to Iowa Senate

March 25, 2024
Iowa House sends illegal immigration bill to Governor’s desk
State Government

Iowa House sends illegal immigration bill to Governor’s desk

March 20, 2024
State Government

School safety bills advance in Iowa Legislature

March 15, 2024
State Government

Iowa House panel advances a bill to reducing unemployment taxes

March 14, 2024
Next Post
Axne Calls for President Trump’s Cabinet to Invoke the 25th Amendment

Axne: Iowa Vets to Receive $1,400 Payments from American Rescue Plan Beginning this Week

Iowa Legislature Repeals Inactive Missouri River Preservation and Land Use Authority

Iowa Legislature Repeals Inactive Missouri River Preservation and Land Use Authority

Recommended Articles

Cisneros Announces He Will Run for Re-Election in Iowa House District 96

Cisneros Announces He Will Run for Re-Election in Iowa House District 96

November 17, 2021
Editorial: Sand Used the State Auditor’s Office to Play Politics

Sand Announces He Will Run for Second Term as State Auditor

December 7, 2021
Grassley, Franken win primaries in Iowa’s U.S. Senate race

Grassley, Franken win primaries in Iowa’s U.S. Senate race

June 8, 2022

Popular Stories

  • Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    Three LGTBQ Books with Sexually Explicit Material Pulled from Waukee School

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Editorial: Johnston School Board can’t legally deny a TPUSA chapter

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Rozenboom: Reflecting on the First Week of the 2021 Legislative Session

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Hendrickson: John Calvin’s contribution to liberty

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Biden promotes E-15 expansion while visiting Iowa

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Current Events
  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government

Newsletter

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.