• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Saturday, September 23, 2023
The Iowa Torch
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion
The Iowa Torch
The Iowa Torch
No Result
View All Result
Home State Government

Religious liberty bills survive funnel in both Iowa House and Iowa Senate

Both bills prohibit a governmental entity from burdening a person's free exercise of religion or from treating religious conduct differently than similar secular conduct.

Shane Vander HartbyShane Vander Hart
February 17, 2022
in State Government
Reading Time: 4 mins read

Southside of Iowa State Capitol at sunset on January 20, 2021.
Photo Credit: Shane Vander Hart

ADVERTISEMENT

DES MOINES, Iowa – Two religious liberty bills passed out of their respective committees in the Iowa House and Iowa Senate, surviving the first funnel week. 

RELATED POSTS

Reynolds, Governors demand ‘honest, accurate’ information about relocated illegal immigrants.

New report says Iowa’s property taxes are 10th highest in U.S.

AG Bird sues over alleged fraudulent door-to-door stem cell therapy treatments

HSB 677 (now numbered HF 2437) passed unanimously out of the Iowa House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. On Tuesday, the Iowa Senate Local Government Committee passed SF 2170 (now number SF 2284) by a party-line 7 to 4 vote.

Both bills prohibit a governmental entity from burdening a person’s free exercise of religion. Both also prohibit governmental entities from treating religious conduct more restrictively than any secular conduct of reasonably comparable risk or treating religious conduct more restrictively than comparable secular conduct because of alleged economic need or benefit. 

The bills were a response to COVID-19 restrictions seen in other states where churches were shut down, but other businesses, such as casinos in Nevada, were allowed to stay open.

During the Iowa House Judiciary Committee, State Rep. Skyler Wheeler, R-Orange City, was asked if this addressed a problem in Iowa. He acknowledged that the bill was meant to prevent that from happening.

Both bills also provide that a person whose free exercise of religion has been burdened in violation of the bill may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, and provides that the governmental entity may be liable for actual damages, attorney fees, costs, and other appropriate remedies. The bill also allows the person to obtain injunctive relief against the governmental entity. 

However, the bills differ in certain respects.

The Iowa Senate bill includes language modeled after the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act. SF 2284 provides that a governmental entity shall not substantially burden a person’s free exercise of religion unless the governmental entity can demonstrate that the action constituting or resulting in the burden is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.

The Iowa House bill does not include that language. Instead, it prohibits a county or city from enacting a private or civil law that would burden a person’s free exercise of religion. 

During the Iowa Senate Local Government Committee, State Senator Rob Hogg, D-Cedar Rapids, opposed the bill because he sees it as a vehicle “to enable discrimination against people based on sexual orientation or race or other reasons.”

He said citing the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in Employment Division v. Smith that the bill “would open the prospect of constitutionally required religious exemptions from civic obligations of almost every kind, ranging from compulsory military service to the payment of taxes to health and safety regulations, such as manslaughter and child neglect laws, compulsory vaccination laws, drug laws, and traffic laws to social welfare legislation such as minimum wage laws, child labor laws, animal cruelty laws, environmental protection laws, and laws providing for equality of opportunity for the races.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

State Senator Dennis Guth, R-Klemme, countered that similar language had been included in federal law and 31 different states. 

“It’s not been a problem,” he said.

State Senator Craig Williams, R-Manning, agreed. 

“Agreed. I think most people just want to be able to go to church and exercise their religion. The First Amendment, we all think, gives us that right to do, and yet we saw in California, in the state of Illinois, governors shutting down churches while keeping other businesses open. And we’re going to stop that,” he said. “It’s unfortunate to me that we even have to have this type of a bill before the Iowa Senate here and because we should be able to rely on our constitutional rights for freedom of religion, and apparently we can’t do that. 31 other states in the federal government also have this law. And I don’t see a problem with it. I’m going to pass it.”

State Senator Julian Garrett, R-Indianola, said the bill does not do what Hogg claimed it does. 

“Exactly what does the bill say? You can’t treat religious conduct more restrictively than comparable secular conduct doesn’t say you can eliminate secular conduct if you have a claim of a religious principle, it says you can’t treat religion more restrictively,” he said. 

“You can’t substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion fundamental constitutional right unless applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion, in a particular situation, is essential to further a compelling governmental interest,” he added. So if it’s essential to compelling a fundamental governmental interest, the bill doesn’t say you can’t burden religion. And it goes on to say, under those circumstances, whatever burden or limitation you’re putting on religion has to be the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. Now, what’s so awful about that? That’s altogether a different standard than what we heard from Senator Hogue just a little bit ago.”

Garrett reiterated to The Iowa Torch in an email that what the Democrats warned about has not happened due to the bill’s language at the federal level or in the states that have adopted that language.

“The bill actually provides a balance between legitimate government activity and the exercise of fundamental constitutional rights,” he said.

Tags: 2022 Iowa Legislative Session89th General AssemblyCraig WilliamsDennis GuthIowa House Judiciary CommitteeIowa Senate Local Government CommitteeJulian GarrettReligious Freedom Restoration Actreligious libertyRob HoggSkyler Wheeler
ShareTweetShare
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Iowa House passes a four percent flat tax

Next Post

Iowa Senate Republicans Release Budget Targets

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of The Iowa Torch.

Related Posts

Reynolds signs bill phasing in 3.9 percent flat tax
Opinion

Hendrickson: Iowa – the gold standard leader in state tax reform

July 27, 2023
Hendrickson: Fiscal Conservatism Works
Opinion

Hendrickson: A pro-taxpayer budget

June 8, 2022
Wheeler Announces Re-Election Bid in Iowa House District 3
Opinion

Letter to the Editor: Support Skyler Wheeler in Iowa House District 4

June 1, 2022
Group Pushes for Tax Cuts with Iowa’s Projected Revenue Growth
State Government

The Iowa Legislature adjourns for the 2022 session.

May 25, 2022
State Government

Iowa House will not vote on school choice bill this year

May 24, 2022
Hendrickson & Williams: Governor Reynolds’ Tax Reform Ideas are Pro-Growth
Education

Reynolds signs bill requiring parental consent for school health screenings

May 3, 2022
Next Post
Whitver Announces Iowa Senate Committee Chairs, Vice Chairs

Iowa Senate Republicans Release Budget Targets

Reynolds joins letter asking Biden, Trudeau to reinstate vaccine, quarantine exemptions

Reynolds joins letter asking Biden, Trudeau to reinstate vaccine, quarantine exemptions

Sign-Up For Our Daily Updates

Get The Iowa Torch right in your inbox!

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recommended Articles

Reynolds Sets Date for Special Election in Iowa Senate District 1

Reynolds Sets Date for Special Election in Iowa Senate District 1

November 4, 2021
Pate: Federal Takeover of Elections Should Be Rejected

Pate: Federal Takeover of Elections Should Be Rejected

May 17, 2021
Iowa Democrats lose first in the nation status

Iowa Democrats lose first in the nation status

December 4, 2022

Popular Stories

  • New ad features DeSantis plan for southern border

    New ad features DeSantis plan for southern border

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Feenstra: Combating President Biden’s electric vehicle mandates

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Iowa Schools Now Required to Lead Students in Pledge of Allegiance

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Reynolds, Governors demand ‘honest, accurate’ information about relocated illegal immigrants.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Schmitt: Strong Women Leaders Work For Iowa. They Can Work For America Too.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

The Iowa Torch

The Iowa Torch​ is a for-profit, news organization that focuses on political news as it relates to Iowans

Categories

  • Education
  • Federal Government
  • Iowa History
  • Local Government
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • State Government
  • Uncategorized
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • State Government
  • Federal Government
  • Local Government
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Opinion

© 2022 The Iowa Torch, a publication of 4:15 Communications, LLC.